Advanced Workshop Evaluations 2009-2017

The evaluation forms were filled out anonymously by the participants at the end of each workshop

31 workshops: 299 participants & respondents from the University of Kent (136);  Kingston University in Moscow (64) and SOAS, University of London (99).

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Presentation & Content 1    2    3    4    5    (4+5)
Instructor's knowledge of the subject 0 0 1
39
259
(100%)
Instructor's method of teaching 0 3
6
79
211 (97%)
Instructor answering questions 0 2
11
71
215 (96%)
Your assessment of the theoretical content?    1
0 36
96
166 (88%)
Your assessment of the role plays? 0 4
10
65
220 (95%)

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Role Play Exercise  1   2   3   4   5   (4+5) 
The Crocodile Story  (41 NA)  

4  
34 
99 
120 
(85%) 

The Mouse Exercise  (55 NA)

The Mercury Negotiation (243 NA)

0

0

2

2

2

1

48

9

192

44

(98%)

(95%)

 

(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree

Future Planning   

3
4
5
(4+5) 
I would recommend this workshop to another student   1
0 3
70
225 (99%)
What I learned will help me in my personal life 0 1
22
90
186
(92%)

The PNBR template is a useful tool in preparing for a negotiation (76 NA)

1

 

2

 

18

 

59

 

143

 

(91%)