Basic Workshop Evaluations 2008-2016

52 workshops: 626 participants & respondents from the University of Kent (386),  Lancaster University (127)  and Kingston University in Moscow(64) SOAS, University of London (49). 

The evaluation forms were filled out anonymously by the participants at the end of each workshop

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Presentation & Content 1 2 3 4 5 (4+5)
Instructor's knowledge of subject 2 1 3 100
520
(99%)
Instructor's method of teaching 2 1
25
200
398
(95%)
Instructor answering questions 2 2 25
199
398
(95%)
What is your assessment of the theoretical content? 2 1 55
253 315
(91%)
What is your assessment of the role plays? 1 1 28 210
386
(95%)
Did the workshop successfully use PowerPoint/ visual/audio aids?   
2
2
38
188
396
(93%)
Role Play Exercises   1 2 3 4 5 (4+5)
The Orange Exercise   2 16
100
227 281
(81%)
Oil Pricing Exercise   3 3
34 156 430
(94%)
The Three-Way Organization Exercise* (244 NA) 2 7 37 126 210
(88%)
Negotiating Corporate Change - Video* (538 NA)  0  0  5  30  27 (92%)

Sally Soprano Exercise*

Universal Aircraft Exercise*

(46 NA)

(600 NA)

2

0

6

0

49

3

201

6

322

17

(90%)

(88%)

Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Exercise  
4
13 103
263
243
(81%)
Luna Pen Exercise* (63 NA) 2 5 49
209
298
(90%)
*Not all workshops included these exercises              

 

(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree

Future Planning 1 2 3 4 5 (4+5)
I would like to take a one-day advanced negotiation course   (23 NA)
5
6 52 146
395
(90%)
I would recommend this workshop to another student 1 2  25 167 431
(95%)
What I learned in this workshop will help me in my personal life 0 8
47
181

390

(91%)