Advanced Workshop Evaluations 2009-2019

The evaluation forms were filled out anonymously by the participants at the end of each workshop

33 workshops: 331 participants & respondents from the University of Kent (136); SOAS, University of London (131) and  Kingston University in Moscow (64). 

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Presentation & Content 1    2    3    4    5    (4+5)
Instructor's knowledge of the subject 0 0 1
44
286
(99%)
Instructor's method of teaching 0 3
7
83
238 (97%)
Instructor answering questions 0 3
11
79
238 (96%)
Your assessment of the theoretical content?    1
0 40
108
182 (88%)
Your assessment of the role plays? 0 4
12
75
240 (95%)

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Role Play Exercise  1   2   3   4   5   (4+5) 
The Crocodile Story  (44 NA)* 


37 
108 
135 
(85%) 

The Mouse Exercise  (72 NA)*

The Mercury Negotiation (261 NA)*

0

0

2

2

4

1

50

12

203

55

(98%)

(96%)

 

(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree

Future Planning   

3
4
5
(4+5) 
I would recommend this workshop to another student   1
0 4
76
250 (98%)
What I learned will help me in my personal life 0 1
23
97
210
(93%)

The PNBR template is a useful tool in preparing for a negotiation (90 NA)*

1

 

2

 

18

 

69

 

151

 

(91%)


* Not all workshops included these exercises