The evaluation forms were filled out anonymously by the participants at the end of each workshop
34 workshops: 344 participants & respondents from the University of Kent (136); SOAS, University of London (144) and Kingston University in Moscow (64).
(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent
| Presentation & Content | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | (4+5) |
| Instructor's knowledge of the subject | 0 | 0 | 1 |
44 |
286 |
(99%) |
| Instructor's method of teaching | 0 | 3 |
7 |
83 |
238 | (97%) |
| Instructor answering questions | 0 | 3 |
11 |
79 |
238 | (96%) |
| Your assessment of the theoretical content? | 1 |
0 | 40 |
108 |
182 | (88%) |
| Your assessment of the role plays? | 0 | 4 |
12 |
75 |
240 | (95%) |
(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent
| Role Play Exercise | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | (4+5) |
| The Crocodile Story (44 NA)* |
1 |
6 |
37 |
108 |
135 |
(85%) |
|
The Mouse Exercise (72 NA)* The Mercury Negotiation (261 NA)* |
0 0 |
2 2 |
4 1 |
50 14 |
203 66 |
(98%) (96%) |
(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree
| Future Planning | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
(4+5) |
| I would recommend this workshop to another student | 1 |
0 | 4 |
76 |
250 | (98%) |
| What I learned will help me in my personal life | 0 | 1 |
23 |
97 |
210 |
(93%) |
|
The PNBR template is a useful tool in preparing for a negotiation (90 NA)* |
1
|
2
|
18
|
69
|
151
|
(91%) |
| * Not all workshops included these exercises |