Basic Workshop Evaluations 2008-2019

58 workshops: 718 participants & respondents from the University of Kent (386), SOAS University of London (140), Lancaster University (128)  and Kingston University in Moscow (64).

The evaluation forms were filled out anonymously by the participants at the end of each workshop

 

(1) very poor (2) poor (3) adequate (4) good (5) excellent

Presentation & Content 1 2 3 4 5 (4+5)
Instructor's knowledge of subject 2 1 3 112
600
(99%)
Instructor's method of teaching 3
3
30
236
446
(95%)
Instructor answering questions 2 2 28
229
457
(95%)
What is your assessment of the theoretical content? 2 2
68
286 360
(90%)
What is your assessment of the role plays? 1 1 35
236
445
(95%)
Did the workshop successfully use PowerPoint/ visual/audio aids?   
2
3
52
221
440
(92%)
Role Play Exercises   1 2 3 4 5 (4+5)
The Orange Exercise  (3 NA)
5
20
127
254 309
(79%)
Oil Pricing Exercise  (4 NA)
3 4
35 182 490
(94%)
The Three-Way Organization Exercise* (336 NA) 2 7 37 126 210
(88%)
Negotiating Corporate Change - Video* (656 NA)  0  0  5  30  27 (92%)

Sally Soprano Exercise*

Universal Aircraft Exercise*

(49 NA)

(692 NA)

2

0

7

0

63

3

223

6

374

17

(89%)

(88%)

Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Exercise  (6 NA)
4
15 117
300
276
(81%)
Luna Pen Exercise* (98 NA) 2 5 60
229
324
(89%)

Alplaus Supply Company Exercise*

( 686 NA)  0  2  2  8  20  (87%)
*Not all workshops included these exercises              

 

(1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neutral (4) agree (5) strongly agree

Future Planning 1 2 3 4 5 (4+5)
I would like to take a one-day advanced negotiation course   (93 NA)
5
6 53 156
405
(90%)
I would recommend this workshop to another student (4 NA)
1 4
 31 185 493
(95%)
What I learned in this workshop will help me in my personal life (3 NA)
0 9
58
201

447

(91%)